2/15/2023 0 Comments Geforce gtx 860m amazon![]() In the EU, AI generated artwork is likely copyrightable: Įdit2: I'm not a lawyer, this isn't legal advice, go contact one if you actually need legal advice here. The above work was granted copyright in Canada and India. The US does seem to be a bit of an outlier here. >“Even though you argue that there is some human creative input present in the work that is distinct from RAGHAV’s contribution, this human authorship cannot be distinguished or separated from the final work produced by the computer program,” the office stated. (Original article is paywalled, reddit post contains the relevant bits) ![]() The US also denied a copyright for one where the creator listed themselves, with the AI just being a co-creator. In the US, AI generated art cannot be copyrighted. As a sibling comment points out, this is exacerbated by the relative frequencies of examples of the data in the dataset. If the dice are just labeled "dice", but don't have a description of how they landed - the model has to guess which angle you're referring to. Every time it sees a face labeled as "face" - it tries to generate a face from the distribution of _all_ faces in the data. Training data is captioned images and the captions are likely noisy and under-specified. Autoregressive transformers have no means to correct early mistakes. This is why "a boy wearing a red shirt and a girl wearing a black jacket" may fail (putting the colors on the wrong items, for instance). Among other things, this means that text-to-image models are very bad at "binding attributes". Transformers seem to approach a "bag-of-words" model, often ignoring the ordering of the words. GPT3) wired to a (denoising) diffusion model. The underlying architecture is a transformer (e.g. Everything the model can do is limited by its architecture, the number of parameters in the model, and the accuracy and size of the training data. ![]() It helps if you consider it all as effectively advanced compression. ![]() Regarding the opening image: if it can't correctly put the marks on dice, how can it put eyes, nose and mouth correctly on a human face?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |